It is important to note that the findings and inferences drawn from this study are specific to the participating states and may not be applied universally. The data provided by the education departments for Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Virginia might not represent the complete range of IDEIA non-compliance determinations identified during the preliminary findings.

​

Findings from this study revealed variations in non-compliance issues among the participating states, highlighting both similarities and differences. While failure to implement the IEP was a common issue across states, the specific aspects not being implemented varied from state to state. The study did not identify consistent patterns where one state had more instances of a particular type of non-compliance issue than another state.

By examining the IDEIA non-compliance determinations provided by the departments of education for Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Virginia, this study sheds light on the challenges faced by school districts in meeting the requirements of the IDEIA. The findings contribute to a better understanding of the issues surrounding the education of children with disabilities and provide insights into potential areas of improvement.

​

Please note that the content of this study is not meant to be generalized beyond the participating states. However, it serves as a valuable resource for policymakers, educators, and stakeholders interested in enhancing compliance and improving the educational experiences of individuals with disabilities under the IDEIA.