top of page


A Comprehensive Study on IDEIA Noncompliance Complaints in School Districts

Discover the in-depth analysis of noncompliance complaints filed against school districts in commonwealth states under the game-changing Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of 2004. Download this comprehensive study now to uncover key insights and actionable recommendations.


The study delves into the non-compliance complaints filed against school districts in commonwealth states under the IDEIA. The purpose was to conduct a content analysis of IDEIA non-compliance determinations made by state education departments. These determinations highlight the specific IDEIA regulations causing difficulties for schools and the educational practices leading to non-compliance.


  1. What issues are raised in IDEIA non-compliance complaints against school districts?

  2. What educational practices are school districts implementing that result in IDEIA non-compliance issues?

  3. Which federal regulations under IDEIA are challenging for school districts in implementing individual education programs (IEPs)?

  4. How do the results of IDEIA non-compliance complaints vary from state to state?


To address these questions, participating departments of education from the commonwealth states (Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Virginia) were requested to select IDEIA non-compliance determinations for review randomly. The qualitative data collected during this study formed the basis for analysis.


Thanks for downloading!

It is important to note that the findings and inferences drawn from this study are specific to the participating states and may not be applied universally. The data provided by the education departments for Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Virginia might not represent the complete range of IDEIA non-compliance determinations identified during the preliminary findings.

Findings from this study revealed variations in non-compliance issues among the participating states, highlighting both similarities and differences. While failure to implement the IEP was a common issue across states, the specific aspects not being implemented varied from state to state. The study did not identify consistent patterns where one state had more instances of a particular type of non-compliance issue than another state.

By examining the IDEIA non-compliance determinations provided by the departments of education for Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Virginia, this study sheds light on the challenges faced by school districts in meeting the requirements of the IDEIA. The findings contribute to a better understanding of the issues surrounding the education of children with disabilities and provide insights into potential areas of improvement.

Please note that the content of this study is not meant to be generalized beyond the participating states. However, it serves as a valuable resource for policymakers, educators, and stakeholders interested in enhancing compliance and improving the educational experiences of individuals with disabilities under the IDEIA.



With over 30 years of experience as an educator, Dr. Marla F. Crawford is a respected researcher dedicated to supporting students, parents, and educators in navigating the complexities of the American education system. As the founder of Elite Educational Consulting, Dr. Crawford offers various services, including Special Education Services, Educational Law, Program Development, and more.


Discover how Dr. Crawford and her team empower families and professionals to thrive in education and beyond.

bottom of page